Platelet Mapping by Thromboelastography and Whole Blood Aggregometry in Adult Patients Supported by Mechanical Circulatory Support Device on Aspirin Therapy.

Patients on mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are placed on aspirin and may require platelet function testing (PFT) to monitor the adequacy of therapy. Routine laboratory PFT is performed using whole blood aggregation (WBA) which typically has a long turnaround time (4-5 hours) and may not be readily available. By contrast, platelet mapping by thromboelastography (TPM) can provide results within 45 minutes. The objective of this study was to compare the results of TPM with WBA. We compared platelet mapping maximal amplitude (MA) by TPM with that of arachidonic acid (AA) to WBA with AA by impedance. We analyzed paired samples where both TPM and WBA were available. Of 45 paired samples, 34 were from 29 MCS patients and 11 were from non-MCS patients. When applying institutional interpretation guidelines with an MAActivator cutoff of ≤40 mm, WBAAA vs TPM MAAA in non-MCS and MCS patients correlated well with an accuracy of 100 and 94.4%, respectively. MAActivator >40 had poor correlation with an accuracy of 37.5%. Irrespective of MAActivator value, TPM AA inhibition expressed in percent of inhibition had poor accuracy. When used with proper guidelines for interpretation, specifically when MAActivator ≤ 40 mm, TPM is a suitable and reliable test to use for MCS patients on aspirin.

High Molecular Weight von Willebrand Factor Multimer Loss and Bleeding in Patients with Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: A Case Series.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (VWS) due to loss of high-molecular-weight multimers (HMWMs) has been reported with longer term mechanical devices and is associated with mucosal bleeding, a primary hemostasis type of bleeding. However, little is known whether a similar defect occurs in patients with short-term mechanical circulatory support (STMCS) devices. We reviewed von Willebrand factor (VWF) profiles in patients with STMCS devices who underwent VWS workup from December 2015 to March 2017 at an academic quaternary care hospital. There were a total of 18 patients (57.0 ± 12.7 years old; 83.3% male) including nine with mucosal bleeding and nine with decreasing hemoglobin. The STMCS devices included Impella (n = 11), Impella and right ventricular assist device (n = 2), and an extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (n = 5). The mean HMWM by quantitative VWF multimer analysis was 3.6% ± 1.3% (normal cutoff: 18-34%). In all 10 cases in which VWF activity, fibrinogen, factor VIII, or VWF antigen level were obtained, they were either normal or elevated. All cases demonstrated high normal or elevated levels of low molecular weight multimers (LMWMs). These findings are consistent with type 2 VWS (qualitative defect). This is the first study that quantitatively describes STMCS device-associated HMWM loss, which may contribute to mucosal bleeding. This finding may have implications for intraoperative management during implantation of longer term devices or heart transplantation or other surgery while on STMCS.

Role of Thromboelastography Platelet Mapping and International Normalized Ratio in Defining "Normocoagulability" During Anticoagulation for Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: A Pilot Retrospective Study.

Thromboembolic (TE) events and hemorrhagic complications continue to remain as frequent adverse events and causes of death after mechanical circulatory support device (MCSD) implantation. To counterbalance this postimplant multifactorial hypercoagulable state, antithrombotic therapy given postimplant must be individually tailored to keep patient adequately anticoagulated yet normocoagulable. Prior studies describing different anticoagulation protocols do not define normocoagulability for patients on MCSDs. We evaluated the role of thromboelastography platelet mapping (TEG PM) in defining "normocoagulability" for MCS patients on anticoagulant (warfarin) and antiplatelet agents. Ninety-eight MCSD patients who underwent TEG PM assay at our institution from 2012 to 2014 were included for retrospective analysis. Eleven (11.2%) subjects developed at least one TE event during the study period. Of the 13 TE events, 8 occurred in patients with total artificial heart (TAH). TEG parameters closest to the event or when patient was clinically adequately anticoagulated and corresponding international normalized ratio (INR) were measured. Thromboelastography coagulation index (CI) appears to be the single most statistically significant parameter that can be used to designate a patient as normocoagulable. Based on our results, patients with HeartMate II (HM II) and Heart Ware (HW) devices should be maintained at a CI value of less than or equal to 1.5 whereas patients with TAH devices should be maintained at a CI less than or equal to 1.2. The CI should be correlated with the degree of Vitamin K-dependent coagulation factor inhibition that is achieved using device-specific goal INR ranges. A recent modification, TEG PM assesses the effects of antiplatelet drug. Maximal amplitude arachidonic acid (MA-AA) < 50 and maximal amplitude adenosine diphosphate (MA-ADP) < 50 are desired for normocoagulable state.

Estimating aminoglycoside clearance and creatinine clearance in underweight patients.

PURPOSE: An adjustment factor (AF) was developed and evaluated to determine the best method for estimating aminoglycoside clearance (CL(amino)) and creatinine clearance (CL(cr)) in underweight patients. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, multicenter, chart analysis of aminoglycoside pharmacokinetic data obtained between January 2000 and August 2006 at the University of Southern California University Hospital and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Adult patients were included in this study if they had received inpatient aminoglycoside therapy, were at least 60 inches tall, and were at least 10% below their ideal body weight (IBW). CL(cr) and CL(amino) were estimated and compared to actual CL(amino) using the Cockcroft-Gault equation with actual serum creatinine (SCr) (CG(SCr)), Cockcroft-Gault equation with SCr rounded to 1 mg/dL (CG(rnd)), and Cockcroft-Gault equation multiplied by an AF (CG(AF)). Results An AF of 0.69 was determined from 52 patients and tested in 53 separate patients. The CG(AF) method was more precise and less biased than the CG(SCr) equation; the CG(rnd) equation was less biased than the CG(SCr) equation; the CG(AF) method was more precise and less biased than the CG(rnd) equation, but this difference was not statistically significant. In underweight patients with an SCr concentration of > or = 1 mg/dL, the CG(AF) method had less bias compared with the CG(SCr) equation. CONCLUSION: Both the CG(rnd) and CG(AF) methods of predicting CL(amino) in underweight patients were superior to the CG(SCr) equation. The CG(AF) method was more accurate in patients exhibiting greater differences between IBW and actual body weight.